<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PCandWEB &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcandweb.com/category/reviews/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcandweb.com</link>
	<description>design, development and daytoday resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 06:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Good Tutorial Has Worst Moderation And Biased</title>
		<link>http://pcandweb.com/reviews/good-tutorials-has-worst-moderation-and-biased.html</link>
		<comments>http://pcandweb.com/reviews/good-tutorials-has-worst-moderation-and-biased.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Subhadeep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good-tutorials.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcandweb.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good-Tutorials.com, the largest depot in tutorials has the worst moderation system and totally biased to old submitters. This is not only my personal grudge many others have faced this too...


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://pcandweb.com/resources/best-photoshop-web-layout-tutorials-and-sources.html' rel='bookmark' title='20+ Best Photoshop Web Layout Tutorials And Sources'>20+ Best Photoshop Web Layout Tutorials And Sources</a></li>
<li><a href='http://pcandweb.com/resources/best-amazing-photo-manipulation-photoshop-tutorials-part-2.html' rel='bookmark' title='30+ Best And Amazing Photo Manipulation Photoshop Tutorials (Part 2)'>30+ Best And Amazing Photo Manipulation Photoshop Tutorials (Part 2)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://pcandweb.com/resources/30-best-and-amazing-photo-manipulation-photoshop-tutorials-part-3.html' rel='bookmark' title='30+ Best And Amazing Photo Manipulation Photoshop Tutorials (Part 3)'>30+ Best And Amazing Photo Manipulation Photoshop Tutorials (Part 3)</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://good-tutorials.com/" rel="nofollow">Good-Tutorials.com,</a> the largest depot in tutorials has the <strong>worst moderation system and totally biased to old submitters</strong>. This is not only my personal grudge many others have faced this too. I have well experimented with 2-3 a/c and have come to this decision. <em>Please Note -  What I have written here is not to oppress the authors but to show you some examples of partiality</em>.Let me show an example..</p>
<p><span id="more-175"></span>This tutorial <a href="http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/36039" rel="nofollow">http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/36039</a> has been rated 4/5 and have been listed, do you think this really is a tutorial worth watching ? Then consider this <a href="http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/36006" rel="nofollow">http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/36006</a> i think its not a good tutorial to get 4/5. Then there is this <a href="http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/36059" rel="nofollow">http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/36059</a>, let me give you a whole list all having more than 4 ratings but personally i don&#8217;t think they really are good-tutorials.</p>
<p>http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/36004</p>
<p>http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/36002</p>
<p>http://www.good-tutorials.com/track/35898</p>
<p>There are many more, <em>this are just my selection from 5 pages</em>. <strong>If you agree that this really are worth giving 4 rating then i think i don&#8217;t have any sense about any tutorial and i should leave designing.</strong> Now to give an example why its biased, check this <a href="http://pcandweb.com/category/tutorials/photoshop">http://pcandweb.com/category/tutorials/photoshop</a> i think<strong> if those tutorial can get minimum 4 rating i should at least be approved</strong> cause i can clearly see my tutorials are better than those tutorials.</p>
<p>Now <strong>after doing some research</strong> i saw that the <strong>tutorials submitted by the old users who have over 100+ tuts are approved even if their tutorial is not upto the mark</strong>, so here comes the great pinch of biasment. <strong>In good tutorial there is a section called upcoming where users rate the queued tutorials</strong>, now let me tell, <strong>ordinary users dont even notice the upcoming thing</strong>, i did&#8217;nt even knew about it, moreover the <strong>users have to be registered to rate</strong>, and <strong>most registered users are tutorial writers</strong> and whenever they see a new tutorial with good rating i guarantee they will sabotage and give you the worst they can so your&#8217;s does&#8217;nt showup, so new users be beware you have nothing to do.</p>
<p>Now i can be biased myself to my self centric decision, but no i&#8217;m not,<strong> i contacted other tutorial writers whose tutorial haven&#8217;t been selected though they were far better</strong>, and they also have the same thing to say. So i must say under this condition&#8230; <strong>THIS IS THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF POLITICS IN INTERNET !!</strong></p>
<p><em>(P.S &#8211; This are my personal feelings you may have different result, but i am sure this is the result 60% new writers get)</em></p>
<p>Get cost effective <a href="http://www.hostseeq.com/c/domain_registration.htm" rel="nofollow">domain names</a> registration and effective <a href="http://www.hostseeq.com/c/internet_marketing.htm" rel="nofollow">search engine marketing</a> service via tranquile <a href="http://www.hostseeq.com/c/merchant_accounts.htm" rel="nofollow">credit card processing</a> utility.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://pcandweb.com/resources/best-photoshop-web-layout-tutorials-and-sources.html' rel='bookmark' title='20+ Best Photoshop Web Layout Tutorials And Sources'>20+ Best Photoshop Web Layout Tutorials And Sources</a></li>
<li><a href='http://pcandweb.com/resources/best-amazing-photo-manipulation-photoshop-tutorials-part-2.html' rel='bookmark' title='30+ Best And Amazing Photo Manipulation Photoshop Tutorials (Part 2)'>30+ Best And Amazing Photo Manipulation Photoshop Tutorials (Part 2)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://pcandweb.com/resources/30-best-and-amazing-photo-manipulation-photoshop-tutorials-part-3.html' rel='bookmark' title='30+ Best And Amazing Photo Manipulation Photoshop Tutorials (Part 3)'>30+ Best And Amazing Photo Manipulation Photoshop Tutorials (Part 3)</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pcandweb.com/reviews/good-tutorials-has-worst-moderation-and-biased.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

